Embedded System Design
Structure Type: | Study unit |
---|---|
Code: | ITTS2201 |
Type: | Optional obligatory / Professional Studies |
Curriculum: | TT 2015 |
Level: | Bachelor of Engineering |
Year of Study: | 3 (2017-2018) |
Credits: | 4 cr |
Responsible Teacher: | Matila, Jukka |
Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
Courses During the Academic Year 2017-2018
Impl. | Group(s) | Study Time | Teacher(s) | Language | Enrolment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | I-TT-3N | 2018-01-08 – 2018-04-27 | Jani Ahvonen | Finnish | 2017-12-11 – 2018-01-15 |
Learning Outcomes
Student will familiarize the development procedures of embedded system and will be able to develop a small scale device with software. During th training period student will familiarize of project based development work and a concept of real-time.
Student's Workload
The total amount of student's work is 108 h, containing 56 h of scheduled contact studies.
Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses
Digital System Design.
Contents
During the course student will familiarize to a development process of a micro controller based. Student will also learn how to develop electronic and software interface for peripheral devices. Exercises will guide practically student to different structures of programming structures, different programming environments and the use of them for developing a prototype of a embedded system. Micro controller dependent programming is done with the C language.
Recommended or Required Reading and Other Learning Resources/Tools
J. Koskinen, Mikrotietokonetekniikka: Sulautetut järjestelmät, 2004 Otava, ISBN: 951-1-19063-6 P. Vahtera, Mikro-ohjaimen ohjelmointi C-kielellä, 2003 WSOY, ISBN: 951-0-24160-8. Material given by the teacher.
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Lectures, exercises.
Assessment Criteria
1: The student is able to develop a simple control system with micro controller.
3: The student can implement a closed loop control system.
5: The student can implement adaptive control system with some algorithm like PID.
Assessment Methods
An examination 30 %, exercisers 40 % and a project work 30 %.