Qualitative and Action Research
| Structure Type: | Study unit |
|---|---|
| Code: | TLYS2402 |
| Type: | Compulsory |
| Curriculum: | TLY 2017 / 2019 |
| Level: | Master of Business Administration |
| Year of Study: | 1 (2017-2018 / 2019-2020) |
| Credits: | 3 cr |
| Responsible Teacher: | Mannila, Margit |
| Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
Courses
| Impl. | Group(s) | Study Time | Teacher(s) | Language | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-LY-1Y | 2020-01-07 – 2020-05-24 | Margit Mannila | Finnish | 2019-12-16 – 2020-01-14 |
The descriptions shown below are for the academic year: 2019-2020
Learning Outcomes
The student knows the basic elements of qualitative research. The student is able to collect material using different qualitative methods. He / she knows the methods of analyzing and reporting qualitative data and is able to evaluate the suitability, strengths and weaknesses of qualitative data.
• material types
• the most common methods of qualitative research
• the relationship between qualitative & quantitative methods
• the process and analysis of qualitative data
The student is familiar with the approach and methodological basic solutions of action research. He / she knows the typical application possibilities, strengths, challenges and weaknesses of action research, especially in relation to his / her own field of education. The student is able to draw up a small-scale action research plan.
• information interests, pragmatics, intervention and bringing about change
• agency, roles of actors, involvement and research ethics in action research
• data collection, principles of analysis and interpretation, and reporting methods
• trends: developmental job research; critical action research and community action research
Student's Workload
3 ETCS/81 h
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Independent study, working on one's own thesis, "supervision dates" (online).
Assessment Criteria
5 The student is able to analyze his / her own research question and choose alternative implementation methods. He can justify and question the choices he has made. The student uses research concepts in a relevant and professional manner. The knowledge base is broad and justified. The student's familiarity with the chosen methods is in-depth. The language is flawless and good in style.
3 The student understands and is able to analyze his / her research question and find connections between the topic and the method he / she is dealing with. The use of the knowledge base is in accordance with the requirements. Synthesis, analysis, and criticality are observable. The language is flawless and good in style.
1 The student deals with the research question and the method he / she uses at a general level. The knowledge base is compliant. A broader approach would be needed to understand and define the concepts. Syntheses, analyzes, and criticality are at a general level or are absent. Only minor shortcomings in the reference technique and the language is quite flawless.
0 The student deals with the material, but the connection to his / her own research question is unclear. The data base does not meet the minimum requirements. There are shortcomings in understanding the concepts. Significant shortcomings in referencing techniques and language.
Assessment Methods
apprpved/rejected