Training Project
| Structure Type: | Study unit |
|---|---|
| Code: | TLS2403 |
| Type: | Compulsory |
| Curriculum: | LT 2015V |
| Level: | Bachelor of Business Administration |
| Year of Study: | 3 (2017-2018) |
| Credits: | 5 cr |
| Responsible Teacher: | Backman, Maj-Lis |
| Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
Courses During the Academic Year 2017-2018
| Impl. | Study Time | Teacher(s) | Language | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2018-01-08 – 2018-05-31 | Leena Pommelin-Andrejeff | Finnish | 2017-12-11 – 2018-01-15 |
Learning Outcomes
The aim is for the student to be able to apply his/her knowledge in practice in the planning and development of a project related to his/hers specialisation alternative. He/she is able to analyse and evaluate the planning and development of projects
Student's Workload
Total work load of the course: 135h
-of which scheduled studies 12h
- Kick-off lecture 4h
- individual / group specific tutoring, feed-back discussion and presentation of project 8h
hours per individual / group
-of which autonomous / independent studies 111h
- independent project work
- preparation of project plan, report and presentation material.
- web-based studies
Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses
Second year specialised studies
Contents
Implementing a need based project. Making a project plan and implementation of a project. Critical evaluation of a project.
Recommended or Required Reading and Other Learning Resources/Tools
Saarinen & al. 2002. From idea to project. National Board of Education.
Project Plans and Project reports of implemented Tourism Projects.
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Conceptualization of a general view, individual/group-based guidance, project learning, operative learning, learning by writing, problem-based learning, web-supported learning.
Assessment Criteria
Grade 5
The student is able to critically evaluate the implementation of the project, comparing the results to the original project plan and argumenting those factors which had an impact on the final result (ability to evaluate the value of implementation decisions). The student is able to create something new based on the existing information (synthesis). The student is able to comprehensively manage the process of project work.
Grade 3
The students is able to apply her knowledge in planning, implementation and evaluation of a project. The student is also able to apply the gathered information in the right situations. The student understands the parts of the whole project and the interrelationship between these parts.
Grade 1
Recognizes the main preconditions for a need based project implementation and basic project work. The student is able to implement a project linked to the industry in a certain environment
Assessment Methods
Numeric scale is used (0-5). A written report of the implemented project. Self-evaluation of the implementation of the project.
-Written report 30%
-Oral presentation 30%
-Work process 20%
-Self-evaluation 20%