Technical Swedish
| Structure Type: | Study unit |
|---|---|
| Code: | IXP0212 |
| Type: | Compulsory / Basic Studies |
| Curriculum: | I-RT 2006V |
| Level: | Bachelor of Engineering |
| Credits: | 4 cr |
| Responsible Teacher: | Kiikkala, Sanna-Liisa |
| Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
Courses
| Impl. | Group(s) | Study Time | Teacher(s) | Language | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I-RT-2V, I-ST-2V | 2008-01-07 – 2008-05-10 | Anja Sjöholm | Finnish | 2007-12-10 – 2008-01-11 |
| 2 | I-KT-3N | 2008-08-25 – 2008-12-20 | Simone Sundqvist | Finnish | 2008-08-15 – 2008-08-31 |
| 3 | I-KT-2V | 2008-08-25 – 2008-12-20 | Maarit Jäntti | Finnish | 2008-08-15 – 2008-08-31 |
| 4 | I-RT-3N | 2008-08-25 – 2008-12-20 | Maarit Jäntti | Finnish | 2008-08-15 – 2008-08-31 |
| 5 | I-YT-3N | 2008-08-25 – 2008-12-20 | Maarit Jäntti | Finnish | 2008-08-15 – 2008-08-31 |
| 6 | 2009-01-05 – 2009-05-02 | Katariina Savolainen | Finnish | 2008-12-08 – 2009-01-23 | |
| 7 | I-TT-3N | 2009-01-05 – 2009-05-02 | Katariina Savolainen | Finnish | 2008-12-08 – 2009-01-11 |
| 8 | I-ST-3N | 2009-01-05 – 2009-05-02 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2008-12-08 – 2009-01-11 |
| 9 | I-RT-3N | 2009-08-24 – 2009-12-19 | Anu Borén, Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2009-08-14 – 2009-09-06 |
| 10 | I-YT-3N | 2009-08-24 – 2009-12-19 | Anu Borén | Finnish | 2009-08-14 – 2009-09-06 |
| 11 | I-TT-3N | 2010-01-04 – 2010-05-01 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2009-12-07 – 2010-01-10 |
| 12 | I-KT-3N | 2010-01-04 – 2010-05-01 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2009-12-07 – 2010-01-10 |
| 13 | I-ST-3N | 2010-01-04 – 2010-05-01 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2009-12-07 – 2010-01-10 |
| 14 | I-ST-2V | 2010-04-01 – 2010-05-01 | Anu Borén | Finnish | 2009-12-08 – 2010-01-10 |
| 15 | I-RT-3N | 2010-08-30 – 2010-12-18 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2010-08-20 – 2010-09-05 |
| 16 | I-YT-3N | 2010-08-30 – 2010-12-18 | Henrik Niemelä | Finnish | 2010-08-20 – 2010-09-05 |
| 17 | I-ST-3N | 2010-08-30 – 2010-12-18 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2010-08-20 – 2010-09-05 |
| 19 | I-KT-2V | 2010-10-25 – 2010-12-18 | Susann Bertills, Sanna-Liisa Kiikkala | Finnish | 2010-10-04 – 2010-10-29 |
| 20 | I-TT-3N | 2011-01-03 – 2011-04-30 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2010-12-07 – 2011-01-09 |
| 21 | I-KT-3N | 2011-01-03 – 2011-04-30 | Sanna-Liisa Kiikkala, Terhi Harju | Finnish | 2010-12-07 – 2011-01-09 |
| 22 | I-YT-2V | 2011-01-03 – 2011-04-30 | Sari Isokangas | Finnish | 2010-12-07 – 2011-01-09 |
Learning Outcomes
The student has sufficient skills i Swedish to manage in various situations in working life and Swedish skills that are required of officials in bilingual areas. S/he understands technical texts of her/his own professional field and is able to produce oral and written Swedish required in an engineer's profession. S/he also understands the significance of language skills and internationality in working life.
Student's Workload
Total work load 108 h, of which 56 scheduled studies and 52 h autonomous studies
Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses
Preparatory Swedish or secondary education Swedish
Contents
Oral and written communication needed in working life, e.g. telephoning situations, company/product presentation and business correspondence;texts and vocabulary on the field of electrical engineering.
Recommended or Required Reading and Other Learning Resources/Tools
Material compiled by the teacher.
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Contact teaching, home assignments and independent studying.
Assessment Criteria
Grade 1: The student is able to participate in most usual work-related situations ja uses simple structures and single words in communications. The student knows part of the vocabulary leartn during the study unit. The student has a positive attitude towards language learning.
Grade 3: The student manages satisfactorily in most usual work-related situations and uses structures and phrases, with occasional mistakes. The student uses the vocabulary leartn during the study unit. The attitude totards language learning is positive.
Grade 5:
The student manages well in various work-related situations and uses structures correctly. The student knows an extensive vocabulary of the field. The student has a positive attitude towards language learning.
Assessment Methods
Exams, continuous assessment and active participation in contact teaching.