Engineering English 2
| Structure Type: | Study unit |
|---|---|
| Code: | IKTP0605 |
| Type: | Compulsory / Basic Studies |
| Curriculum: | I-KT 2011V |
| Level: | Bachelor of Engineering |
| Year of Study: | 3 (2013-2014) |
| Credits: | 3 cr |
| Responsible Teacher: | Kiikkala, Sanna-Liisa |
| Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
Courses During the Academic Year 2013-2014
| Impl. | Group(s) | Study Time | Teacher(s) | Language | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | I-KT-2N | 2013-09-02 – 2013-12-21 | Sanna-Liisa Kiikkala | Finnish | 2013-08-16 – 2013-09-13 |
| 4 | I-KT-3N | 2013-09-02 – 2013-12-21 | Sanna-Liisa Kiikkala | Finnish | 2013-08-16 – 2013-09-13 |
| 5 | I-KT-2V | 2014-01-06 – 2014-05-17 | Camilla Harald | Finnish | 2013-12-09 – 2014-01-10 |
| 6 | 2014-01-06 – 2014-05-17 | Sanna-Liisa Kiikkala | Finnish | 2013-12-09 – 2014-01-10 |
Learning Outcomes
The student can write reports related to the projects in the common core theme and present the project orally and write instructions. S/he can write business letters and professional e-mails in English. S/he understand texts on the field of mechanical engineering and on the common core theme and knows vocabulary in the field as well. S/he can also describe a process in English.
Student's Workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h, of which
scheduled studies 42 h
and autonomous studies 39 h
Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses
Technical english I
Contents
Business correspondence, presentations, writing reports and instructions; process desciption, texts and vocabulary of the mechanical field.
Recommended or Required Reading and Other Learning Resources/Tools
Material compiled by the teacher
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Contact teaching, home assignments and independent studying.
Assessment Criteria
Grade 5: The student is able to communicate fluently, almost without mistakes, both in speech and in writing in work-related situations. S/he has an extensive vocabulary of the field and understands field-specific texts without difficulty. The student can produce a well-structured and almost faultless project report.
Grade 3: The student knows the essential vocabulary and understands the texts in the field. S/he is able to participate in a work-related conversation, with occasional mistakes and errors in the speech. The student is able to produce a project report or an abstract for it using.
Grade 1: The student knows the basic vocabulary of the field and understands the main points of texts in the field. S/he can follow work discussions and can give a presentation by reading it from the paper. The student is able to produce a satisfactory project report, or an abstract for it, using a template.
Assessment Methods
Exams, assessment of assignments, continuous assessment, assessment of oral proficiency